This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons downloading the PDF files linked hereto are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted, republished, duplicated, or distributed to any entity, individuals or individual without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
| |
Refereed Papers: |
 |
Brewer, G. A., Knight, J. B., Unsworth, N., & Marsh, R. L. (In Press). Individual
differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes
supporting cue detection. Memory & Cognition. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Brewer, G. A., Jameson, J. P., Cook, G. I., Amir, N., & Hicks, J. L. (2009).
Threat related processing boosts prospective memory retrieval for people with
obsessive tendencies. Memory, 17, 679-686. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Meeks, J.T., Cook, G. I., Clark-Foos, A., Hicks, J. L., & Brewer, G. A. (2009).
Retrieval constraints on the front end create differences in recollection on a
subsequent test. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 470-479. |
|
Meeks, J. T., & Marsh, R. L. (2009). Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks. Psychological Research, DOI 10.1007/s00426-008-0223-x. |
|
Clark-Foos, A., Brewer, G., Marsh, R. L., Meeks, J. T., & Cook, G. I. (2009). The valence of event-based prospective memory cues or the context in which they occur affects their detection. American Journal of Psychology, 122, 89-97. |
|
Clark-Foos, A. & Marsh, R. L. (2008). Recognition memory for valenced and arousing materials under conditions of divided attention. Memory, 16, 530-537. |
|
Jones, L. L., Estes, Z., & Marsh, R. L. (2008). An asymmetric effect of relational integration on recognition memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1169-1176 . |
|
Meeks, J. T., Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2007). Metacognitive awareness of event-based
prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 997-1004. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., Meeks, J. T., Clark-Foos, A., & Hicks, J. L. (2007). Memory
for intention-related material presented in a to-be-ignored channel. Memory &Cognition, 35, 1197-1204. |
|
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., Clark-Foos, A., & Meeks, J. T. (2007). Learning is impaired
by activated intentions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 101-106.. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Meeks, J. T., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., & Clark-Foos, A. (2006).
Concreteness and item-to-list context associations in the free recall of items differing
in context variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 32, 1421-1430. |
|
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Martin, B. A. (2006). Fan effects in event-based
prospective memory. Memory, 14, 890-900. |
|
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). Source memory in the absence of
successful cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 32, 828-835. |
|
Starns, J. J., Cook, G. I., Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2006). On rejecting emotional lures
created by phonological neighborhood activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 847-853. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). Task interference from event-based
intentions can be material specific. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1636-1643 |
|
Cook, G. I., Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2007). Source monitoring is not always
enhanced for valenced material. Memory & Cognition, 35, 222-230. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). The effect of context variability on
source memory. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1578-1586. |
|
Starns, J. J., Hicks, J. L. & Marsh, R. L. (2006). Repetition effects in associative false
recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule. Memory,
14, 742-761. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective
memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory &
Cognition, 34, 1037-1045. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., & Mayhorn, C. B. (in press). Comparing older and
younger adults in an event-based prospective memory paradigm containing an
output monitoring component. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition., 14, 168-188 |
|
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L.(2006). The role of recollection and familiarity in
the context variability mirror effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 240-250. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). Gender and orientation stereotypes bias
source-monitoring attributions. Memory, 14, 148-160. |
|
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based,
event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory
and Language, 53, 430-444. |
|
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). An observation on the role of context
variability in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 31, 1160-1164. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward
an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 68-75. |
|
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Revisiting the role of recollection in item
versus forced-choice recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12,
720-725. |
|
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Associating a time-based prospective
memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 345-360. |
|
Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., & Marsh, R. L. (2005). Detecting event-based prospective
memory occurring within and outside the focus of attention. American Journal of
Psychology, 118, 1-11. |
|
Taylor, R. S., Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T.W. (2004). The influence of
partial-match cues on event-based prospective memory. Memory, 12, 203-213. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2004). Focused attention on one contextual
attribute does not reduce source memory for a different attribute. Memory, 12,
183-192. |
|
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2003). Halo and devil effects demonstrate
valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions. Consciousness &
Cognition, 12, 257-278. |
|
Leynes, P. A., Bink, M. L., Marsh, R. L., Allen, J. D., & May, J. C. (2003). Test modality
affects source-monitoring and event-related potentials. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 389-413. |
|
Leynes, P. A., Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Allen, J. D., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2003). Investigating the encoding and retrieval of intentions with event-related potentials
(ERPs). Consciousness & Cognition, 12, 1-18. |
|
Hancock, T. W., Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Ritschel, L. (2003). Measuring the activation
level of critical lures in the DRM paradigm. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 1-14. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to
ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 861-870. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and
coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 652-659. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hancock, T. W., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity
influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review, 9, 604-610. |
|
Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). Comparisons of target output monitoring to source
input monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 845-862. |
|
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Ritschel, L. (2002). The role of recollection and partial
information in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 28, 503-508. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Davis, T. T. (2002). Source monitoring does not alleviate (and
may exacerbate) the occurrence of memory conjunction errors. Journal of Memory
and Language, 47, 315-326. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Hancock, T. W. & Munsayac, K. (2002). Investigating the output
monitoring component of event-based prospective memory performance. Memory& Cognition, 30, 302-311. |
|
Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2002). On predicting the future states of awareness for
recognition of unrecallable items. Memory & Cognition, 30, 60-66. |
|
Katz, S. B., Marsh, R. L., Johnson, C., & Pohl, E. (2001). Answering quasi-randomized
reading items without the passages on the SAT-I. Journal of Educational Psychology,
93, 772-775. |
|
Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2001). Output monitoring tests reveal false memories of
memories that never existed. Memory, 9, 39-51. |
|
Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2001). False recognition occurs more frequently during
source identification than during old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 375-383. |
|
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Russell, E. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and
their affect on retaining prospective memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1160-1169. |
|
Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2000). Toward specifying the attentional demands of
recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 26, 1483-1498. |
|
Bink, M. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2000). Cognitive regularities in creative activity. Review of
General Psychology, 4, 59-78. |
|
Landau, J. D., Marsh, R. L., & Parsons, T. (2000). Dissociation of two kinds of source
attributions. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 539-551. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T. W. (2000). On the interaction of ongoing
cognitive activity and the nature of an event-based intention. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 14, S29-S42. |
|
Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (1999). Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with
source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 25, 1195-1209. |
|
Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (1999). Remember-know judgments can depend on how the
question is asked. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 117-122. |
|
Marsh, R. L.,Ward, T. B., & Landau, J. L. (1999). The inadvertent use of prior knowledge
in a generative cognitive task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 94-105. |
|
Bink, M. L., Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Howard, J. D. (1999). The credibility of a source
influences the rate of unconscious plagiarism. Memory, 7, 293-308. |
|
Bink, M. L., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1999). An alternative conceptualization to
memory “strength” in reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 804-809. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Bryan, E. S. (1999). The activation of unrelated and cancelled
intentions. Memory & Cognition, 27, 320-327. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Bink, M. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1999). Conceptual priming in a generative
problem-solving task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 353-363. |
|
Hicks, J. L. & Marsh, R. L. (1998). A decrement to familiarity interpretation of the
revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1105-1120. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L. & Landau, J. D. (1998). An investigation of everyday prospective
memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 633-643. |
|
Marsh, R. L. & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision
processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24,
1137-1151. |
|
Leynes, P. A., Allen, J. D., & Marsh, R. L. (1998). Topographic differences in CNV
amplitude reflect different preparatory processes. International Journal of
Psychophysiology, 31, 33-44. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., Hicks, J. L., & Bink, M. L. (1998). On reducing retroactive
interference. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 175-190. |
|
Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive
control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 24, 336-349. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L. & Bink, M. L. (1998). The Activation of completed, uncompleted,
and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 24, 350-361. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1997). Contributions of inadequate source
monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 886-897. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Sebrechts, M. M., Hicks, J. L. & Landau, J. D. (1997). Processing strategies
and secondary memory in very rapid forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 25, 173-181. |
|
Landau, J. D., & Marsh, R. L. (1997). Monitoring source in an unconscious plagiarism
paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 265-270. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1996). The post-information effect and
reductions in retroactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1296-1303. |
|
Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not)
constrain creativity. Memory & Cognition, 24, 669-680. |
|
Marsh, R. L. & Landau, J. D. (1995). Item availability in cryptomnesia: Assessing its role
in two paradigms of unconscious plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1568-1582. |
|
Marsh, R. L. & Bower, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: Unconscious plagiarism in a
puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
19(3), 673-688. |
|
Sebrechts, M. M., Marsh, R. L., & Seamon, J. G. (1989). Secondary memory and very
rapid forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 17(6), 693-700. |
|
Sebrechts, M. M., & Marsh, R. L. (1989). Components of computer skill acquisition: Some
reservations about mental models and discovery learning. In G. Salvendy & M. J.
Smith (Eds.) Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge
Based Systems: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Human-Computer
Interaction, (pp. 168-173). New York: Elsevier. |
|
Seamon, J. G., Marsh, R. L., & Brody, N. (1984). Critical importance of exposure duration
for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(3), 465-469. |
|
|
|
